A Guide to Neuroaffirming and Disability-Aligned Language

by | Professionals

A Glossary for Educators and Specialists to Support Progress Reports, Evaluations and Assessments

In filling out forms and reading reports as my son transitions into adult care, each page is filled with words that, to many professionals, might seem neutral or just “how it’s always been written.” Words like incapacitated, non-verbal, deficits, and disorders show up repeatedly.

For parents and disabled individuals, those words land heavily. They reinforce the idea that the person is broken or limited instead of highlighting the barriers around them.

As an educational consultant and former public school teacher, I see how easily this language carries over into schools, therapy sessions, and even casual conversations. Most of the time, professionals don’t mean harm. They’re repeating what’s on forms, in training manuals, or in reporting systems that haven’t been updated in decades.

We may not be able to rewrite every form we’re required to fill out, but we can choose our words differently when we write reports, send emails, and talk to families and colleagues.

This glossary is written for teachers, therapists, specialists, and administrators who want to use language that reflects the respect and dignity every learner deserves.

It’s about awareness, intention, and care.

Use this glossary as a living reference. Keep what fits, question what doesn’t, and continue to evolve with the language of the communities you serve.

A photo of a staff of professionals participating in a neuroaffirming and disability-aligned training
Professionals participating in a neuroaffirming and disability-aligned training.

Language will always evolve. The goal is not perfection but mindfulness.

 

What is neuroaffirming and disability-aligned language?

Neuroaffirming language is a way of communicating that recognizes that brains and bodies naturally vary and that these differences are not problems to be fixed but part of human diversity.

When we use neuroaffirming and disability-aligned language, we speak and write from the belief that a learner’s challenges often come from their environment or from barriers in systems, not from something “wrong” within them.

This approach shifts the focus away from deficits and toward access, respect, and context. 

Instead of saying a student “refuses to work,” for instance, we might say the student “communicates fatigue or overwhelm.” The difference is subtle but meaningful, and it opens the door for curiosity and collaboration rather than blame.

Using this kind of language doesn’t mean ignoring reality or glossing over difficulties. It means describing what is happening without attaching shame or judgment. It means we center the person, not their diagnosis or perceived limitations.

Neuroaffirming and Disability-Aligned Glossary | Free Download by Gabriella Volpe

Neuroaffirming and Disability-Aligned Glossary

Replacing deficit-based language in progress reports, evaluations, and assessments. Ideal for educators, therapists, and specialists.

Why language matters in education and therapy

Language shapes how we see our students and how they see themselves. The words used in classrooms, reports, and meetings influence expectations, relationships, and even opportunities for support.

When an educator or therapist describes a child as “non-compliant,” that label can stick, influencing how others interact with them. If instead we say the child “needs clearer expectations or a predictable routine,” we identify a solvable barrier.

In inclusive education, the goal isn’t perfection in phrasing but awareness. 

The language we choose signals whether learners are welcomed as they are or expected to fit a mold. When we shift from deficit-based descriptions to affirming and strengths-based language, we help create classrooms and programs where all learners are seen, valued, and supported.

A photo of a student studying knowing staff is respectfully using neuroaffirming and disability-aligned language
A student studying, knowing staff are respectfully using neuroaffirming and disability-aligned language.

 

How to use this neuroaffirming and disability-aligned glossary

 

Each entry includes:

 

  • Outdated/Clinical Language – the phrase that is often found on forms or in reports.
  • Affirming – more current, descriptive, or person-centered language.
  • Why This Matters – context for understanding the shift.
CLOSED
Communication
Terms related to speech, language, and expression

Outdated/Clinical Affirming Why This Matters
Non-verbal Non-speaking

Uses AAC to communicate

“Non-verbal” implies the absence of communication. “Non-speaking” recognizes multiple modes, such as gestures, AAC, and typing.
Limited vocabulary Communicates by [insert how they communicate]

Is expanding language repertoire

Recognizes communication competence at any level.
Poor eye contact Communicates by [insert how they show they are engaged in conversation] Acknowledges cultural and neurodivergent differences in communication.
Doesn’t listen Needs processing time Centers the communication gap on the environment and method, not the learner.
Deficits in social skills Describe how they socialize: “Prefers parallel play,” “Builds comfort through observation.” Focuses on behavior rather than judgment and removes deficit framing.
Lacks empathy Expresses empathy by [insert how they express empathy] Respects neurodivergent expressions of care and understanding.
Social Interaction
Phrases used to describe social interactions and relationships

Outdated/Clinical Affirming Why This Matters
Poor social awareness Processes social cues by …

Navigates social setting by …

Shifts from deficit to difference.
Deficits in social skills Describe the social style: “Prefers parallel play,” “Builds comfort through observation before joining.” Normalizes diverse social expression.
Withdrawn or loner Prefers solitude

Recharges through quiet or independent activity

Removes stigma from introverted or regulation-seeking behavior.
Behavior and Regulation
Terms often used in behavior reports or incident notes

Outdated/Clinical Affirming Why This Matters
Defiant/Oppositional Communicates boundaries

Seeks autonomy by …

Acknowledges self-advocacy and the need for control or predictability.
Meltdown/Tantrum Responds to distress by …

Needs support with self-regulation

Removes moral judgment and centers on nervous system overload.
Refuses to work Needs task adjustments

Communicates discomfort or fatigue by …

Recognizes behavior as communication rather than opposition.
Acts out Communicates needs by …

Needs predictability

Reframes behavior as communication
Attention-seeking Connection-seeking

Communicates unmet needs by …

Everyone needs attention. Reframing acknowledges the child’s need for connection or reassurance.
Behavior problem Communicates their needs by …

Emotional regulation needs

All behavior communicates. This phrasing invites curiosity over correction.
Sensory and Physical
Phrases about movement, regulation, or physical differences

Outdated/Clinical Affirming Why This Matters
Hyperactive Energetic

Seeks movement or stimulation

Reflects a natural need for activity, not a behavioral issue.
Overly sensitive Emotionally perceptive

Sensitive to the environment or sensory input

Affirms sensory awareness as a trait, not a weakness.
Wheel-chair bound Wheelchair user

Uses a wheelchair

A wheelchair is a tool for mobility, not confinement.
Incapable or incapacitated Requires support for decision-making

Needs assistance in …

Describes context-specific support needs without erasing capability.
At risk Vulnerable

Facing systemic barriers

Focuses on inequity in systems rather than individual weakness.
Executive Functioning (EF)
Terms related to focus and attention, organization, and task completion

Outdated/Clinical Affirming Why This Matters
Poor attention or easily distracted Benefits from movement breaks

Benefits from structured breaks

Needs clear visual cues

Needs environmental accommodations

Reframes attention as a support need rather than a flaw.
Disorganized Benefits from executive function supports

Needs visual structure

Acknowledges EF as a skill area, not a personal failure
Forgetful Benefits from visual cues, checklists, or habit trackers

Needs repetition

Focuses on tools and supports.
Engagement
Terms around participation and interest

Outdated/Clinical Affirming Why This Matters
Lazy or unmotivated Experiencing fatigue, overwhelm, or task mismatch Shifts focus from character to conditions that make participation difficult.
Doesn’t engage Observes first

Needs [define entry point] for participation

Recognizes varied learning and regulation styles.
Dependent on adult support Works best with guided partnership

Is building independence

Frames support as part of growth.
Non-compliant Is working on cooperation

Is building autonomy

Shows self-advocacy by …

“Compliance” centers obedience. Affirming terms center agency and safety.
Disinterested Motivated by [insert topics]

Needs [insert needs] to connect

Centers intrinsic motivation rather than assumed apathy.
Learning
Phrases found in reports, assessments, IEPs and 504s

Outdated/Clinical Affirming Why This Matters
Low-functioning/High-functioning Requires significant/minimal support “Functioning” creates hierarchies and erases nuance. Support-based terms are more accurate.
Low cognitive ability Learns best through concrete examples Needs more time for processing Recognizes learning diversity without ranking intelligence.
Failure to make progress Progressing in … Recognizes unique learning trajectories.
Poor problem-solving abilities Needs guided modeling and practice with problem-solving strategies Focuses on growth potential.
Poor or low literacy skills Emergent reader Focuses on the reading stage without judgment.
Doesn’t try hard enough Needs support with motivation, confidence, or regulation Connects effort to the environment and emotional readiness.
General Terms
Overarching terms that shape the learner’s worldview

Outdated/Clinical Affirming Why This Matters
Special needs Neurodivergent or disabled or the diagnosis Disability is a neutral identity. “Special” can sound patronizing.
Suffers from [condition] Living with …

Has …

Is diagnosed with …

Removes pity
Normal peers or normal kids Peers or other kids Centers the individual without labeling others as the standard.
At risk Is vulnerable

Is facing systemic barriers

Focuses on inequity in systems rather than individual weakness.
Behavior problem or agreessive or violent Communication through [behavior]

Has an emotional regulation need

Behavior is communication. And all communication is dynamic and ever-changing.

Reflection

 

Before writing your reports or speaking to parents or learners, ask:

 

  • Am I describing the learner’s needs and context, or am I labeling the learner as the problem?

Language doesn’t magically fix systems, but it does signal care.

 

Small shifts in language change how we see people and how they see themselves. We build trust, not just with families, but within our own teams.

This glossary is part of my ongoing work supporting educators, therapists, and organizations in building more accessible, inclusive systems. If you’d like support with reviewing your team’s language or reports, or with professional development in neuroaffirming communication, I’d be happy to support you and your team.

Support for Educators and Professionals

Support for Organizations

Get more anecdotes and strategies like this one

iPad with an email from Gabriella Volpe

Sign-up to my newsletter for professionals

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

By signing up for email alerts, you agree to receive updates and promotions to support you in your role in education or therapy. You can unsubscribe at any time.

0 Comments

More Resources

Continue reading my essays, activities, and case studies for supporting the education of disabled/chronically ill and neurodivergent children.