A Glossary for Educators and Specialists to Support Progress Reports, Evaluations and Assessments
In filling out forms and reading reports as my son transitions into adult care, each page is filled with words that, to many professionals, might seem neutral or just “how it’s always been written.” Words like incapacitated, non-verbal, deficits, and disorders show up repeatedly.
For parents and disabled individuals, those words land heavily. They reinforce the idea that the person is broken or limited instead of highlighting the barriers around them.
As an educational consultant and former public school teacher, I see how easily this language carries over into schools, therapy sessions, and even casual conversations. Most of the time, professionals don’t mean harm. They’re repeating what’s on forms, in training manuals, or in reporting systems that haven’t been updated in decades.
We may not be able to rewrite every form we’re required to fill out, but we can choose our words differently when we write reports, send emails, and talk to families and colleagues.
This glossary is written for teachers, therapists, specialists, and administrators who want to use language that reflects the respect and dignity every learner deserves.
It’s about awareness, intention, and care.
Use this glossary as a living reference. Keep what fits, question what doesn’t, and continue to evolve with the language of the communities you serve.
Language will always evolve. The goal is not perfection but mindfulness.
What is neuroaffirming and disability-aligned language?
Neuroaffirming language is a way of communicating that recognizes that brains and bodies naturally vary and that these differences are not problems to be fixed but part of human diversity.
When we use neuroaffirming and disability-aligned language, we speak and write from the belief that a learner’s challenges often come from their environment or from barriers in systems, not from something “wrong” within them.
This approach shifts the focus away from deficits and toward access, respect, and context.
Instead of saying a student “refuses to work,” for instance, we might say the student “communicates fatigue or overwhelm.” The difference is subtle but meaningful, and it opens the door for curiosity and collaboration rather than blame.
Using this kind of language doesn’t mean ignoring reality or glossing over difficulties. It means describing what is happening without attaching shame or judgment. It means we center the person, not their diagnosis or perceived limitations.
Neuroaffirming and Disability-Aligned Glossary
Replacing deficit-based language in progress reports, evaluations, and assessments. Ideal for educators, therapists, and specialists.
Why language matters in education and therapy
Language shapes how we see our students and how they see themselves. The words used in classrooms, reports, and meetings influence expectations, relationships, and even opportunities for support.
When an educator or therapist describes a child as “non-compliant,” that label can stick, influencing how others interact with them. If instead we say the child “needs clearer expectations or a predictable routine,” we identify a solvable barrier.
In inclusive education, the goal isn’t perfection in phrasing but awareness.
The language we choose signals whether learners are welcomed as they are or expected to fit a mold. When we shift from deficit-based descriptions to affirming and strengths-based language, we help create classrooms and programs where all learners are seen, valued, and supported.
How to use this neuroaffirming and disability-aligned glossary
Each entry includes:
- Outdated/Clinical Language – the phrase that is often found on forms or in reports.
- Affirming – more current, descriptive, or person-centered language.
- Why This Matters – context for understanding the shift.
CLOSED
Communication
| Outdated/Clinical | Affirming | Why This Matters |
| Non-verbal | Non-speaking
Uses AAC to communicate |
“Non-verbal” implies the absence of communication. “Non-speaking” recognizes multiple modes, such as gestures, AAC, and typing. |
| Limited vocabulary | Communicates by [insert how they communicate]
Is expanding language repertoire |
Recognizes communication competence at any level. |
| Poor eye contact | Communicates by [insert how they show they are engaged in conversation] | Acknowledges cultural and neurodivergent differences in communication. |
| Doesn’t listen | Needs processing time | Centers the communication gap on the environment and method, not the learner. |
| Deficits in social skills | Describe how they socialize: “Prefers parallel play,” “Builds comfort through observation.” | Focuses on behavior rather than judgment and removes deficit framing. |
| Lacks empathy | Expresses empathy by [insert how they express empathy] | Respects neurodivergent expressions of care and understanding. |
Social Interaction
| Outdated/Clinical | Affirming | Why This Matters |
| Poor social awareness | Processes social cues by …
Navigates social setting by … |
Shifts from deficit to difference. |
| Deficits in social skills | Describe the social style: “Prefers parallel play,” “Builds comfort through observation before joining.” | Normalizes diverse social expression. |
| Withdrawn or loner | Prefers solitude
Recharges through quiet or independent activity |
Removes stigma from introverted or regulation-seeking behavior. |
Behavior and Regulation
| Outdated/Clinical | Affirming | Why This Matters |
| Defiant/Oppositional | Communicates boundaries
Seeks autonomy by … |
Acknowledges self-advocacy and the need for control or predictability. |
| Meltdown/Tantrum | Responds to distress by …
Needs support with self-regulation |
Removes moral judgment and centers on nervous system overload. |
| Refuses to work | Needs task adjustments
Communicates discomfort or fatigue by … |
Recognizes behavior as communication rather than opposition. |
| Acts out | Communicates needs by …
Needs predictability |
Reframes behavior as communication |
| Attention-seeking | Connection-seeking
Communicates unmet needs by … |
Everyone needs attention. Reframing acknowledges the child’s need for connection or reassurance. |
| Behavior problem | Communicates their needs by …
Emotional regulation needs |
All behavior communicates. This phrasing invites curiosity over correction. |
Sensory and Physical
| Outdated/Clinical | Affirming | Why This Matters |
| Hyperactive | Energetic
Seeks movement or stimulation |
Reflects a natural need for activity, not a behavioral issue. |
| Overly sensitive | Emotionally perceptive
Sensitive to the environment or sensory input |
Affirms sensory awareness as a trait, not a weakness. |
| Wheel-chair bound | Wheelchair user
Uses a wheelchair |
A wheelchair is a tool for mobility, not confinement. |
| Incapable or incapacitated | Requires support for decision-making
Needs assistance in … |
Describes context-specific support needs without erasing capability. |
| At risk | Vulnerable
Facing systemic barriers |
Focuses on inequity in systems rather than individual weakness. |
Executive Functioning (EF)
| Outdated/Clinical | Affirming | Why This Matters |
| Poor attention or easily distracted | Benefits from movement breaks
Benefits from structured breaks Needs clear visual cues Needs environmental accommodations |
Reframes attention as a support need rather than a flaw. |
| Disorganized | Benefits from executive function supports
Needs visual structure |
Acknowledges EF as a skill area, not a personal failure |
| Forgetful | Benefits from visual cues, checklists, or habit trackers
Needs repetition |
Focuses on tools and supports. |
Engagement
| Outdated/Clinical | Affirming | Why This Matters |
| Lazy or unmotivated | Experiencing fatigue, overwhelm, or task mismatch | Shifts focus from character to conditions that make participation difficult. |
| Doesn’t engage | Observes first
Needs [define entry point] for participation |
Recognizes varied learning and regulation styles. |
| Dependent on adult support | Works best with guided partnership
Is building independence |
Frames support as part of growth. |
| Non-compliant | Is working on cooperation
Is building autonomy Shows self-advocacy by … |
“Compliance” centers obedience. Affirming terms center agency and safety. |
| Disinterested | Motivated by [insert topics]
Needs [insert needs] to connect |
Centers intrinsic motivation rather than assumed apathy. |
Learning
| Outdated/Clinical | Affirming | Why This Matters |
| Low-functioning/High-functioning | Requires significant/minimal support | “Functioning” creates hierarchies and erases nuance. Support-based terms are more accurate. |
| Low cognitive ability | Learns best through concrete examples Needs more time for processing | Recognizes learning diversity without ranking intelligence. |
| Failure to make progress | Progressing in … | Recognizes unique learning trajectories. |
| Poor problem-solving abilities | Needs guided modeling and practice with problem-solving strategies | Focuses on growth potential. |
| Poor or low literacy skills | Emergent reader | Focuses on the reading stage without judgment. |
| Doesn’t try hard enough | Needs support with motivation, confidence, or regulation | Connects effort to the environment and emotional readiness. |
General Terms
| Outdated/Clinical | Affirming | Why This Matters |
| Special needs | Neurodivergent or disabled or the diagnosis | Disability is a neutral identity. “Special” can sound patronizing. |
| Suffers from [condition] | Living with …
Has … Is diagnosed with … |
Removes pity |
| Normal peers or normal kids | Peers or other kids | Centers the individual without labeling others as the standard. |
| At risk | Is vulnerable
Is facing systemic barriers |
Focuses on inequity in systems rather than individual weakness. |
| Behavior problem or agreessive or violent | Communication through [behavior]
Has an emotional regulation need |
Behavior is communication. And all communication is dynamic and ever-changing. |
Reflection
Before writing your reports or speaking to parents or learners, ask:
- Am I describing the learner’s needs and context, or am I labeling the learner as the problem?
Language doesn’t magically fix systems, but it does signal care.
Small shifts in language change how we see people and how they see themselves. We build trust, not just with families, but within our own teams.
This glossary is part of my ongoing work supporting educators, therapists, and organizations in building more accessible, inclusive systems. If you’d like support with reviewing your team’s language or reports, or with professional development in neuroaffirming communication, I’d be happy to support you and your team.
Get more anecdotes and strategies like this one
Sign-up to my newsletter for professionals
By signing up for email alerts, you agree to receive updates and promotions to support you in your role in education or therapy. You can unsubscribe at any time.

0 Comments